Saturday, April 25, 2020
Jamie Turner free essay sample
Six years back he earned his MBA from a top-rated Business school. Turner is struggling in his third management position since he completing his MBA just six-years earlier. Turner is currently working for Modern Lightning Industries, Inc. (MLI) were he is hired for the job Vice President for marketing and sales. Problem Statement Jamie Turner is unhappy about the fact that Cardullo is not keeping his promises and that he is reversing Turnerââ¬â¢s decisions. Jamie turner is concerned about this because sales are declining at MLI and things in general are rapidly deteriorating. Jamie turner is concerned about the fact that he is not sure if he took the right decision by taking this job at MLI Inc. Reason for this is because of his Boss, Cardullo, who turned out not to be the friendly guy he was during the interview and who promised Turner he could become one of the Presidents within two years. We will write a custom essay sample on Jamie Turner or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Why and what is the business impact ( sales decrease because bad relationship between turner and Cardullo ) Analyses ( conflict management ) During the case there are a lot of problems that appear. The problems began as early as Turnerââ¬â¢s interview. There were a lot of unsaid expectations, the psychological contract between Turner and Cardullo consisted of the fact that Turner believed he would become the new president of MLI Inc. within two years, while Cardullo never actually committed to that. Also, Turner believed he would be learning his way into the new company, while Cardullo gave Turner the full autonomy over pricing within weeks (instead of partially and over a longer amount of time). Turner believed he received too much on his plate too rapidly. Cardullo also appeared to lack emotional intelligence, a key factor in leadership. By the way he yelled at people in public you could see he lacked social skills and showed no empathy. Thereby he created a hostile work-environment and made his employees scared of him. This will not help the general motivation and therefore damage the overall performance of the company. Also, he was not really self-awarded, he does not understand other people and how they see him. For instance, the fact that he could not understand Turnerââ¬â¢s reason to sell certain goods below break-even-point and the fact that had the layout of the warehouse revered again, just because he wanted it another way show that he did not understand other people and there way they were doing business. Jamie Turner free essay sample This is reason why they had conflicts with each other. As the Case said, Jamie left previous company Wolf River because he felt himself stagnating in product management and started to think about moving on. His value is to pursuit of high social status and autonomy. So when he entered the MLI, he attempts to show himself in front of others and let upper supervisor accept his ability. He soon began building a product management capability and recruited persons to create a productive team. He is also arrogant, Jamie had the impression that he knew more about the specific than Cardullo did after they finished the interview. However, Cardullo worked for the company for long period, otherwise he is a senior in this company. He needs othersââ¬â¢ respect and honor, this is Cardulloââ¬â¢s value. So one is likely to show himself and ignore others, the other is need to respect. We will write a custom essay sample on Jamie Turner or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page This situation can easily produce conflict between the two persons. In one of the conflict, Cardullo reminded Jamie that he is still the president of MLI. The expectations of management are also different between them. Jamie expects a team to work together while Cardullo think each manager should run his or her own are with minimal help from other functions. This is potential dangerous for the future conflicts. For example, the attitudes toward one of the director sales Tim Kelly is different. Jamie think Kelly can provide a big help but Cardullo wanted to fire him. Whatââ¬â¢s more, the believes of them is different too. Jamie believes a cardinal rule in dealing with subordinates taught by his first boss: ââ¬Å"Praise in public, censure in private. â⬠However, Cardullo just did the opposite view, he censured everyone in the public. So Jamie must feel very frustrated when Cardullo blame him hardly in each conflicts, this will make conflicts more deteriorate. Personality I learned that people have different personalities will lead different ways to deal with a same thing. Personality is judged combined with inborn and then developed by our life experiences. Once managers have different personalities in companies, if not balance well, they may emerge big conflicts about company decisions. In this case, some conflicts are leaded by the differences of personalities of Jamie and Cardullo. One different pair is Jamie is likely to be a perceiving and Cardullo is a judging. Jamie is very care about the specific and detailed factors before he made decisions. Cardullo made decisions quickly and based on limited data, such as he just focused on the margins about the sales strategy. We can learn from case that Cardullo came out the new pricing scheme which really planed too simple. In contrast, Jamie thought about the differences in demand, competitive situation, and the unique qualities of each item. Jamie tried to objection Cardullo as forcefully as possible, but Cardullo insisted on going ahead with his plan because Cardullo is a judger which means he attempts to ignore input of others and unwilling to change or modify decision when new data emerge. The other different pair of personalities is thinker and feeler. Cardullo is a thinker, he likes using objective things to measure a decision. He thought Tim Kelly lack of conscious of bigger picture, and have a decision to fire him. But Jamie is a feeler who is people- oriented. He is likely to care about otherââ¬â¢s feelings, so he wanted to hold off on that decision. Otherwise Cardullo didnââ¬â¢t want to put himself into otherââ¬â¢s shoes, he not consider otherââ¬â¢s feelings. Cardullo used a lot of profanity words to his subordinates and even blame others in staff meetings. Cardullo and Jamie have completely different personalities, this must lead them in different thought and behaves. So conflicts of the companyââ¬â¢s decisions will continually appear between them. Motivation Motivation is the important piece of managing employee performance. A person can understand goals, but must also be motivated to pursue them. In a company, different people have different motivations, managers need to understand these motivations and use them to encourage employees to perform good performances in workplace. From the case, I know Jamie had left two jobs in less than two years because he wanted to get more extrinsic rewards. He decided to join the MIL because Cardullo promise him the kind of autonomy he was seeking, future promotion which replaces Cardullo as a president, high salary. But after period of time in MIL, Jamie felt Cardullo failed to give some motivation he promised in the interview. Jamie was very angry and disappointed about that. Whatââ¬â¢s worse, Cardullo even demotivation Jamie about the decisions he made. When Jamie had approved a large sale of excess- inventory halogen bulbs at below the break-even point, Cardullo stormed into Jamieââ¬â¢s office and shouted impolitely. Cardullo also declined all three invitations from Jamie, Cardullo refused to talk with Jamie about the conflicts of decision making. It really made Jamie frustrated in the company. Cardullo really do the wrong thing about the subordinatesââ¬â¢ motivation. He not only failed matched the extrinsic rewards he promised Jamie at first but also demotivation Jamie in a rude way. So the conflicts between them are certainly.
Wednesday, March 18, 2020
Free Essays on Declining Ethics In American Culture
Declining Ethics in American Culture It is unfortunate to see how ethics in the American culture are constantly declining. Peopleââ¬â¢s moral values are below normal societal standards, which is why, the older generations are outraged by the way things are now, and become rather upset and feel disturbed towards society. Furthermore, religion has lost its value throughout the years. In the essay, "Do Kids Need Religion?" by Anthony Brandt, he underlines the idea of how religion is not properly taught or provided to children. In Wendy Shalitââ¬â¢s essay, "The Future of Modesty," she discusses how much modesty has reached its worst in the younger generations, however society is beginning to raise these standards once again. Nonetheless, education has also lost its honor code. Mark Clayton calls attention to how cheating is becoming incredibly common among students throughout the United States in his essay, "A Whole Lot of Cheatinââ¬â¢ Going on." In fact, it is obvious that American culture is declining fast in eth ics, especially in religion, dating, and education. First, religion has often played an important role in peopleââ¬â¢s lives, however its significance continues to decrease in recent decades. Parents do not pass on faith or beliefs onto their children, because most parents do not have faith or beliefs. These parents believe it would be hypocritical to teach their children about being spiritual, when they are not spiritual themselves. Children often go to their parents with questions regarding matters such as death, life, and God, but "Western culture is so secularized that parents can evade or dismiss 'religious' questions without feeling that theyââ¬â¢re merely getting themselves off the hook" (Brandt 193). In contrast with todayââ¬â¢s society, back in the old days, most Americans sought enlightenment in faith and religion. Today many people question religion, and even "spokesmen, leaders, and so on do not have the kind of influence and i... Free Essays on Declining Ethics In American Culture Free Essays on Declining Ethics In American Culture Declining Ethics in American Culture It is unfortunate to see how ethics in the American culture are constantly declining. Peopleââ¬â¢s moral values are below normal societal standards, which is why, the older generations are outraged by the way things are now, and become rather upset and feel disturbed towards society. Furthermore, religion has lost its value throughout the years. In the essay, "Do Kids Need Religion?" by Anthony Brandt, he underlines the idea of how religion is not properly taught or provided to children. In Wendy Shalitââ¬â¢s essay, "The Future of Modesty," she discusses how much modesty has reached its worst in the younger generations, however society is beginning to raise these standards once again. Nonetheless, education has also lost its honor code. Mark Clayton calls attention to how cheating is becoming incredibly common among students throughout the United States in his essay, "A Whole Lot of Cheatinââ¬â¢ Going on." In fact, it is obvious that American culture is declining fast in eth ics, especially in religion, dating, and education. First, religion has often played an important role in peopleââ¬â¢s lives, however its significance continues to decrease in recent decades. Parents do not pass on faith or beliefs onto their children, because most parents do not have faith or beliefs. These parents believe it would be hypocritical to teach their children about being spiritual, when they are not spiritual themselves. Children often go to their parents with questions regarding matters such as death, life, and God, but "Western culture is so secularized that parents can evade or dismiss 'religious' questions without feeling that theyââ¬â¢re merely getting themselves off the hook" (Brandt 193). In contrast with todayââ¬â¢s society, back in the old days, most Americans sought enlightenment in faith and religion. Today many people question religion, and even "spokesmen, leaders, and so on do not have the kind of influence and i...
Monday, March 2, 2020
Modernizing Liturgical English
Modernizing Liturgical English Modernizing Liturgical English Modernizing Liturgical English By Maeve Maddox A reader writes: In church, our liturgy has traditionally used a phrase such as Thou Who sittest at the right hand of God the Father to refer to Jesus, singular. As we have changed over from using the King James Bible translation, we have also gradually changed from use of thee and thou and the est forms of the verbs in the liturgy. I believe, then, that we should be singing You Who sit at . . . but those in charge have written You Who sits at . . . It disturbs me (only slightlyI know the intended meaning regardless of the word used) every time I sing it. Am I correct or just being picky? I dont think the reader is being picky. It makes sense that if editors are going to modernize a 16th century idiom, the changes ought to reflect standard modern usage. In the year 2009, you sits is not standard usage, neither spoken nor written. The confusion with the passage quoted lies with the word who, which may be either singular or plural: The man who is sitting on the wall can see the lighthouse. The men who are sitting in the tree can also see it. In the liturgical quotation above, who refers to singular thou. Thou who sittest at the right hand of the Father translates as You who sit at the right hand of God the Father. Personally I object to changing the old verb forms in liturgical use. When a student wants the most up-to-date translation, obviously the King James Version is not the one to rely on. If encouraging religious feeling is the goal, however, I cant think of anything more beautiful and stirring than a reading from the KJV. Most of the tongue-twisters can be avoided by substituting the sound /s/ for the -eths. Thats very likely what many of the original readers of the KJV did anyway. A.C. Baugh points out (A History of the English Language), that Shakespeare used both the eth and -s forms for third-person verbs, as in this passage from A Merchant of Venice (c. 1597): The quality of mercy is not straind, It droppeth as a gentle rain from heaven Upon the place beneath: it is twice blessd; It blesseth him that gives and him that takes:â⬠¦ Baugh quotes Richard Hodgess A Special Help to Orthographie (1643) in which the writer notes the disconnect between how verbs are written and how they are pronounced in ordinary speech: Howsoever wee use to Write thus, leadeth it, maketh it, noteth it, raketh it, per-fumeth it, etc. Yet in our ordinary speech (which is best to bee understood) wee say, leads it, makes it, notes it, rakes it, per-fumes it. Its refreshing to seein the 17th century, as in the 21stthe standard written dialect at odds with the standard spoken dialect. An Unexpected Question About You O Second Person Singular, Where Art Thou? Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Grammar category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:50 Synonyms for ââ¬Å"Leaderâ⬠Best Websites to Learn EnglishList of 50 Compliments and Nice Things to Say!
Friday, February 14, 2020
The results of the US involvement in Iraq Research Paper
The results of the US involvement in Iraq - Research Paper Example Nevertheless, the US invasion on Iraq has been considered as one of the most momentous and controversial foreign policy decisions that have ever been made by the American government. Different scholars and political analysts of the world have been divided over the explanation of the American war on Iraq. With a group of them agreeing that it was necessary to maintain world peace by silencing Iraq while the other group finds it unnecessary and a war that had a different motive than just maintaining the world peace. Today, effects of American presence in this country and the impacts of the invasion are still evident. It would be observed that the leadership in Iraq was transformed from dictatorship to democracy a government where the Iraqi citizens had more influence on policies of the government. Also, the presence of America in Middle East helped contain the major militant gangs of the world; Taliban and Al-Qaida; a great step towards uplifting the lives of the different citizens of Iraq and Middle East. But did this solve the Iraqi problem of leadership? Was the government established Democratic? Did this end terror in the region? Iraqi together with several other nations of Middle East today is perceived to be home to the most brutal and dangerous militia group in the world-ISIS. This brutal group has continued to violate the universality of the human rights as stipulated under the UN Human Right Convention of 1948. Now, do we blame America for going in Iraq or do we blame the extremists in Iraq? These are few of the questions that linger in the minds of many individuals today. The truth is that America has had a stake in what is happening in Iraq and the presence of America in Iraq is what has resulted to both the emergence of al-Maliki system of governance and the rise of militia groups in Iraq. This research paper seeks to establish the effects of America presence in Iraq and its influence on the emergence of al-Maliki governance and militia groups in
Sunday, February 2, 2020
E market paper Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words
E market paper - Essay Example This paper focuses on the online fashion shoppers as the target market, and www.net-a-porter.com and http://www.shopstyle.com as the key websites that can meet the needs of the chosen target market. ShopStyle Website has a better communication strategy while Net-A-Porter website has a better structure and appeal to viewers. The Net-A-Porter Group Limited considers itself as the worldââ¬â¢s premier online luxury fashion retailer. The market segment in this case is the luxury online fashion shoppers. The Net-A-Porter Group Limited was launched in 2000 and has successfully established itself in market using its luxury brand. The company prides itself in its exceptional pricing and highly effective customer care that has enabled them to remain strong and favoured in the highly competitive fashion market. Their website www.net-a-porter.com is an award winning website presented in a unique way ââ¬â as a fashion magazine. The luxury fashion company targets online savvy luxury customers, and offers them what they want ââ¬â customized fashion clothes designed to meet the specific needs of each customer. It focuses on bringing out the best looks of customer. The Net-A-Porter Group Limited provides cutting-edge labels and delivers its products through the worldwide express delivery. Customers find clothes of their choice from the companyââ¬â¢s online store, and order whatever they want. The company then delivers them to wherever the customer prefers it to be delivered. The online luxury fashion market segment is a large market because most people who demand luxury products use the internet, and prefer their products to be delivered to their convenient places. The visitors of the companyââ¬â¢s website per month are about 2.5 million. That shows that about 83,000 people frequent the website daily. This indicates that the online luxury market
Friday, January 24, 2020
Vouchers and School Choice are Bad :: Argumentative Persuasive Topics
School Choice and Vouchers are Bad I have spent considerable time reading the literature on the topic of school choice and tuition vouchers. I was initially in favor of the idea simply because it seems to be common sense. After just a little reading, I am now an advid supporter. After all, our entire standard of living is based on the idea of choice. The more choices we have, and the means to pursue those choices, the higher the standard of living we enjoy. In our lives, simply stated, choice means everything. When it comes to public schooling is there a choice? David Kirkpatrick, in his book, Choice In Schooling, argues that choice already exists de facto in our system and it is not regulated. It is because of this lack of regulation such inequality exists. Let us not kid ourselves, education may profess to be about equity and equal opportunity, but this has never been the case in America or any other country. Education is about power. Power is a tool guarded by those who have it. Those with the means in this society already have exercised their choice and have built their own schools based on choice and in turn new opportunities. The masses have then been left to the confines of a limited system. Make no mistake, in a capitalist society, this is by design. I remember reading the America at Risk report on Education in America, there was one line in there that summed up the educational system in this country and the lack of effort to change it. "If this current educational system was instituted in America by a foreign nation, it would be cause for a social revolution and a formal declaration of war." Yet it is accepted by those in power and justified for its existence through laws and coercion of the masses. Why then do schools stay relatively unchanged? The article, A School for Choice, by Debra Viadero, outlines some "red flags" that are meant to caution for school choice. In my opinion, taken together, these make a weak argument at best to counter the need for choice. The concern of parents being good consumers is a good example of a ridiculous red flags. I suppose it is better to have no choice than to have any choice? Given time, parents will become savvy to the market and make good consumer decisions. Vouchers and School Choice are Bad :: Argumentative Persuasive Topics School Choice and Vouchers are Bad I have spent considerable time reading the literature on the topic of school choice and tuition vouchers. I was initially in favor of the idea simply because it seems to be common sense. After just a little reading, I am now an advid supporter. After all, our entire standard of living is based on the idea of choice. The more choices we have, and the means to pursue those choices, the higher the standard of living we enjoy. In our lives, simply stated, choice means everything. When it comes to public schooling is there a choice? David Kirkpatrick, in his book, Choice In Schooling, argues that choice already exists de facto in our system and it is not regulated. It is because of this lack of regulation such inequality exists. Let us not kid ourselves, education may profess to be about equity and equal opportunity, but this has never been the case in America or any other country. Education is about power. Power is a tool guarded by those who have it. Those with the means in this society already have exercised their choice and have built their own schools based on choice and in turn new opportunities. The masses have then been left to the confines of a limited system. Make no mistake, in a capitalist society, this is by design. I remember reading the America at Risk report on Education in America, there was one line in there that summed up the educational system in this country and the lack of effort to change it. "If this current educational system was instituted in America by a foreign nation, it would be cause for a social revolution and a formal declaration of war." Yet it is accepted by those in power and justified for its existence through laws and coercion of the masses. Why then do schools stay relatively unchanged? The article, A School for Choice, by Debra Viadero, outlines some "red flags" that are meant to caution for school choice. In my opinion, taken together, these make a weak argument at best to counter the need for choice. The concern of parents being good consumers is a good example of a ridiculous red flags. I suppose it is better to have no choice than to have any choice? Given time, parents will become savvy to the market and make good consumer decisions.
Thursday, January 16, 2020
How The Internet has Affected the Music Industry Essay
When Tim-Berners Lee dreamt up the, then, crazy idea, of an inter-global network, Iââ¬â¢m sure very few people had the same optimism in believing that it could happen in the future. Over the last ten years, the Internet has evolved from just web pages to e-mail, to online gaming, to viewing sport and film previews, and to buying and downloading music online. The Internet has now become one of the music industryââ¬â¢s greatest markets, estimated to reach over 25% of sales in five years. This may be true, yet the Internet is also one of the music industries greatest enemies. For some years now online shopping has been available to anyone with a credit card and an Internet connection. E-commerce retailers such as Amazon.com sell everything from garden tools, to C.Dââ¬â¢s and mini-discs. It is only in the last couple years however, that online shopping has taken off. Before this the public and businesses alike had not been taking full advantage of this phenomenal asset, which has been proven to save companies millions. It was only with the creation of Windows 98 and other Internet programs that people were sure that their credit card numbers and personal details could not be viewed by another person, or ââ¬Ëhackedââ¬â¢. Once this huge hurdle was overcome, the way we used the Internet and the effect it had on the music industry had changed forever. The close relationship between the Internet and the music industry has led to many dramatic revolutions. First of all it has changed the way in which we purchase music. It has also opened up a new medium for record companies and musicians to promote their music, and now consumers can listen to music via technology such as RealAudio. Also, with peoples Internet connections getting faster all the time, and now with the invention broadband Internet, you can listen to music through Internet Radio Stations whilst still surfing the Internet, a new technique called ââ¬Ëstreamingââ¬â¢. From a consumers point of view this is all excellent news, and I am sure there is yet more to come. But from the music industryââ¬â¢s perspective, not all of this new technology is helping their cause. Many areas of the musicà industry have been affected in a bad way, areas such as musicians and record companies worry about copyrights, songwriters and music publishers also worry about copyrights, and distributors and high street retailers worry about sales, and they should be worried as C.D shipments went down by 7% in the first six months of 2002. Copyrights are based on control of the market: how and when a copyright work is used. So the Internet has changed the foundations of the music industry. Because it is so easy and inexpensive to create a website, this makes it easy to put someoneââ¬â¢s copyrighted work on to your website and the Internet, therefore making it available for anyone to listen to or copy. As many consumers will still download this copyrighted music for free it is obvious that they do not believe that copyrights stand for much. This is all part of a much larger problem, controlling the distribution of copyrighted music on the Internet, a task that surely is near impossible with so many websites committing copyright fraud. The most famous example of copyright fraud occurred on June 1, 1999. With Microsoftââ¬â¢s supreme dominance over the computing industry and the Internet, not many other companies get a look in. In the end it took a first year university student called Shawn Fanning with the help of funding from his uncle to disrupt the balance of power. It was with the creation of an MP3 website called Napster that the public really took to downloading music from the Internet. Up until the formation of Napster, the technology had been available but had not really made it into the mainstream. You might say that it was Napster that revolutionised the way we obtain music from the Internet, not the new technology. There was however, one fatal flaw with this website. All the music that was being ââ¬Ësharedââ¬â¢, had copyright to its name, and Napster was using these songs without paying the record companies. So on December 7, 1999, The Recording Industry Association of America sued Napster for copyright infringement. They were asking for damages of $100,000 each time a song was copied. This however did not stop Napster operating as normal, it was only when they were sued by the hugely popular rock band Metallica that Napster was prompted to take action, or at least look like they were taking action. It was on October 31, 2000 that Napster announced a new partnership withà Bertelsmann-RCA in which Bertelsmann put à £26,000,000 into Napster to keep it going. Then on July 26, 2001 a federal judge ordered to shut down Napster, but the music industryââ¬â¢s elation did not last long, just two days later it was up and running again. Now Napster is working together with major record companies EMI, Sony Music Entertainment and Universal to develop a system where consumers using the service will pay per song or a monthly subscription fee. This is a new system, which will attempt to benefit everyone. So despite the early indications that all this technology would go to waste, Microsoft, the record companies and Internet companies seem to have sorted themselves out. The Internet may have once been a huge enemy for the music industry, but it seems like the Internet is now on its way to having an extremely positive affect on the music industry.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)